![]() Now we probably all know (from Ookla), but I regularly hear that the values you get from them are very questionable and do not give a good idea of the real speed you get from your ISP. I did a speetest on on several different servers I am at 60 constant (apart from a few months or even a week ago I was at 120)ġ. iperf and mikrotik get very close to full speed. never gets more that 100Mbps international. Then you also have this topic for example: ![]() There are other topics that also report that there may be a difference between the two websites: Translation: For 3 months, I have been on fiber (see my signature), I have a symmetrical Orange 400Mb/s package (down and up) with Nperf, I always have around 400 in both directions and even sometimes a little more!, but with Speedtest I never exceeded 300, often even below 200! measurements taken at the same time! I even had very low values below 10 when it was wrong. Original French text: Depuis 3 mois, je suis fibré (voir ma signature), j'ai un forfait Orange 400Mb/s symétrique (en down et up ) avec Nperf, j'ai toujours autour de 400 dans les 2 sens et même des fois un peu plus!, mais avec Speedtest je n'ai jamais dépassé 300, souvent même en dessous de 200 ! mesures faites au mêmes instants ! j'ai même eu des valeurs très faibles inférieures a 10 alors que c'était faux. Ookla's Speedtest is less qualitative for me and the upload is often blocked for me. nPerf uses multiple simultaneous connections for its test. Translation: Our reference site is nPerf, and I advise to always use the same server (manual choice) Wingo in Switzerland 100Gbs. ![]() Speedtest d'Ookla est pour moi moins qualitatif et souvent l'upload est bloqué chez moi. nPerf utilise plusieurs connexions simultanées pour son test. Original French text: Notre site de référence est nPerf, et je conseille d'utiliser toujours le même serveur (choix manuel) Wingo en Suisse 100Gbs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |